By character I mean the things that add to make you novel, the things that are yours and any other individual’s. The reason for the inquiry was that personality is just viewed as Identity in specific methodologies yet not, on the whole, for instance, nobody would agree that that the Big Five Factor model is taking about Identity, however, McAdams joined model discussions around three levels in personality and the third one is alluding to Identity. With everything taken into account, it is an extremely mind-boggling idea in mental sciences as no one knows precisely how to concentrate on it logically, so truth be told it would be something abstract
Personality is something that you give yourself. It has to do with a big motivator for you, ethics, values, and so on.
It is who you are truly and lawfully, yet all at once, that is only a fundamental “you know that” explanation.
Character is how you depict or “live in” your personality.
For instance, you can recognize portions of somebody’s character: amusing, alluring, clever, entertaining.
Both adjust and change over the long haul, yet your character changes now and again, I accept. Together, they make an entire individual.
It’s truly hard to offer a substantial response because a ton of this can be emotional, begging to be proven wrong and complex.
It’s additionally essential to recall that while now and again your character and personality might be something similar, eventually, they serve unique “jobs.” If somebody says “you’re remarkable”, it’s valid. Both your character and character make you interesting. They help each other like that.
How about we investigate this from an alternate point: Let’s say that we realize this person named Tom is a killer. That is his character. His character, notwithstanding, may not depict that and can put on a show of being fun or beguiling. Character is how somebody acts. The two of them go all around well together yet that doesn’t imply that they are comparing all of the time. However, by and large, you will observe that they are comparable.
Way of life as characterized by the American Psychological Association (APA). A few key attributes include:
self-characterized (for example a person’s healthy self-appreciation)
a feeling of congruity over the long run
physical, mental, and relational attributes, including values, convictions and assumptions relating to oneself
Character as characterized by the APA. A few key attributes include:
rises out of a person’s special acclimation to life (dynamic incorporation of nature and support, like genetic and social impact)
incorporates significant attributes, interests, drives, values, self-idea, capacities, and enthusiastic examples
congruity over the long run
One key qualification, in light of the APA meaning of ideas, is that character is self-characterized. Passionate examples and characteristics are solely character spaces, while relational jobs (for example mother, sibling, bunch part) are solely character areas.
Simultaneously, there is some ill-defined situation between the two spaces. Like qualities. For instance, Latin Americans (contrasted with those in the US) might be bound to have collectivistic (instead of individualistic) esteem frameworks (connecting with the character), based on focusing on the necessities of the gathering over that of your own, similarly, have outgoing character types.
As I would see it, I think personality is a sort of legacy. Something that the world gives you that you can’t change. For instance, you can’t change your date of birth or where you were conceived. My birthday is essential for my personality. I’m Iranian and being Iranian is a piece of my personality. My folks gave me a name so it’s one more piece of my personality. Although, a character is something that makes me special. For instance, many individuals were brought into the world on a similar date and, surprisingly, live in a similar spot. Many individuals have a similar name as me, yet not my principles, requests, needs, encounters, schooling, etc. Not even one of them thinks and carries on like me. Personalty is those covers and veils I use on myself on the planet. This is my personality. Perhaps all I said was bogus, however, I simply needed to impart my insight.
Character is both something we’re brought into the world with – innate character attributes – and something we foster in light of our current circumstances, expectations and dreams.
Personality is something we develop into because society considers back us who they wish us to be, who they request us to be, and the singular conditions of our reality – where we fit into various status jobs.
Our character can impact our personality and we are so adaptive to life’s new development. We can be difficult (a character quality) and that makes it difficult to change when required, for example, a personality misfortune happens (from wedded to single) and we want to sort out who we are present, with that irretrievable misfortune.
Then again, our character can be delicate to such an extent that we frequently adjust our character to fit the requirements of others over our necessities. The accommodating person’s personality.
The two words are completely interwoven and it’s a chicken or the egg phenomenon. Also, to me – personality is the gestalt, characterized by the jobs we play and our convictions about our status.
While a character is more about conduct – activities that others can see.
Eventually, personality is the response to the inquiry “Who are you?”
Character is the response to the inquiry “What sort of individual would you say you are?”